The Resolute Investor

  • HOME
  • ABOUT
  • WORK WITH ME
  • CONTACT

Threshold Rebalancing

By Vitaly on April 10, 2015 4 Comments

This is the third and the final part of Rebalancing series. Previously (here and here), I have checked how often one should rebalance an investment portfolio for a traditional 60% stocks and 40% bonds portfolios as well as for a multi-asset, broadly diversified portfolio. In both cases, annual rebalancing performed better than semi-annual and quarterly.

Today, I am going to analyze a predetermined threshold rebalancing method and summarize which rebalancing method works best and which one you may use to reduce portfolio risk and enhance performance.

What Is a Threshold Rebalancing?

A threshold rebalancing method assumes rebalancing your portfolio once any asset class or individual stock in the portfolio deviates from its target weight by a predetermined level. It can be a 1%, 5%, 10% or any other level your are comfortable with. Fundamentally, this method significantly differs from a time-based, where one rebalances a portfolio periodically based on a chosen time interval. Depending on your threshold level you may end up rebalancing either too often (multiple times during one year) or infrequently (a few times every 3-5 years).

In order to see the benefits of the threshold rebalancing, I’ve conducted a test for 1%, 3%, and 5% threshold levels on a multi-asset class portfolio. When any asset class in the portfolio drifted above or below the threshold level on any given day, all asset classes would be rebalanced back to their target weights.

Consistent with my previous analysis, analysis was based on the following assumptions:

  • Testing period: 12/31/2003 – 3/20/2015
  • ETFs used: “VTI” for US stocks, “AGG” for bonds, EFA for developed markets stocks, EEM for emerging markets stocks, IYR for real estate and GLD for gold
  • Rebalancing threshold levels: 1%, 3%, 5%, and  no rebalancing
  • Starting portfolio balance $100,000
  • Trading transactions and taxes are not accounted for

A sample diversified portfolio that I used in my tests has the following allocation:

  • US Stocks – 35%
  • Bonds – 20%
  • International developed markets stocks– 15%
  • Emerging markets stocks – 10%
  • Real Estate – 10%
  • Gold – 10%

As we can see on the charts below, doing threshold rebalancing significantly improves portfolio performance when compared to “no rebalancing” portfolio.

Threshold

Threshold_zoomed

When we breakdown by the threshold levels, we can see that rebalancing at 5% level increases portfolio balance to $253,331 which is 2.3% higher than 1% threshold, 2.1% higher than 3%, and 10.3% higher than “no rebalancing” portfolio. That is a big difference which you cannot simply leave on the table. Risk-wise, rebalancing each time at a 5% level decreases risk as measured by standard deviation to 13.1%, which is 0.8% lower in comparison to “no rebalancing portfolio.” The other factor I would like to focus your attention on is the number of rebalancing events. For a 1% level you would have to do 109 rebalancing events, while at 5% level just 7. Taking into account transaction costs, the advantage of 5% level would be even more.

A quick takeaway: without any doubts threshold rebalancing works, reduces portfolio risk and increases return when compared to “no rebalancing” portfolio.

Time-Based Vs. Threshold Rebalancing

The last thing I would like to do is compare a multi-asset portfolio with time-based rebalancing to the same portfolio but using threshold level rebalancing.

Last week I showed that an annually rebalanced portfolio performed better that quarterly or semi-annually both return and risk-wise. But how does annual rebalancing compare to threshold rebalancing? Which method is better?

To answer this question, let’s look at the table below.

Threshold_table

As can be seen from the table, 5% threshold level enhanced the portfolio return by almost 2% over the annual rebalancing method, or 0.4% per year. However, risk was 0.1% higher 5% threshold level. The difference in risk is negligible and I would not pay much attention to it. However, 0.4% annual threshold level advantage is a meaningful, in my opinion, and if you can obtain it by simply switching between the methods, why not to do it?

Conclusion

I’ve shown that whatever rebalancing frequency or threshold level you choose, rebalancing enhances overall portfolio performance and, most importantly, decreases the level of portfolio volatility when compared to “no rebalancing” portfolio. For most individual investors the best approach would be to do it at a 5% threshold level, or at least annually. Despite better performance and less risk, another good reason for less frequent rebalancing is avoidance of transaction costs. The more often you rebalance your portfolio the higher the negative effect of transaction costs is, which can eat up a significant portion of rebalancing profit.

Another important thing to note is that rebalancing is a time-consuming process and heavily depends on how diversified your portfolio is. The more asset classes/stocks you have in it, the harder it is to rebalance. If you have no time nor clear understanding which method you should choose, I would recommend hiring an investment adviser who will identify the best method and perform all the “dirty” job for you. The only thing I am confident is that rebalancing works, enhances returns, and reduces risk. That’s why you should never ignore it.

Spread the Word:

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Print
  • More
  • Email

Related posts:

Time-based Portfolio Rebalancing with Multiple Asset Classes How Frequently Should You Rebalance? A Devastating Impact of High Fees on Your Account Sell in June and Go Away?

Filed Under: Investing Tagged With: investing, rebalancing

Comments

  1. Adam says

    April 21, 2015 at 5:19 pm

    very good but telling people especially older people their financial person has been over charging them for years is not easy. Oh, he is such a nice guy he picks me up and takes me out to lunch for my b day every year.

    Sales charge on purchases
    Deferred sales ch
    Purchase fees
    Exchange feeRedemption fees
    Management fees
    Wrap fees
    12b-1 fees
    Administrative expenses
    Custodial expense
    Transfer agent expense
    Transaction costs including:
    * Brokerage commissions
    * Soft-dollar arrangements
    * Bid-offer spreads
    * Market impact costs

    Reply
    • Vitaly says

      April 21, 2015 at 6:15 pm

      Adam, thanks for commenting.

      It is hard to disagree with you.. If, in addition to exorbitant fees paid for holding specific funds, an adviser overcharges too, then someone is probably in the most terrible situation he can ever be. The only thing I would repeat again is to double check every time what you are paying for. Every time.

      As for a financial or investment adviser, that is a good reason to have a fiduciary investment adviser. He is obligated to act in client’s interest, protect and grow his savings, meaning he is not likely to charge extremely high fees.

      Reply
  2. rohit says

    December 15, 2017 at 1:59 am

    Dear Vitaly,

    Would you have the python codes for backtesting rebalancing. It would be really helpful. Thank you.

    Reply
    • Vitaly says

      December 17, 2017 at 6:17 am

      Hi Rohit,

      Unfortunately, I don’t have python codes. All my testing was done in Excel.

      Reply

Leave a Reply to rohit Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

About Vitaly

I am a retirement plan adviser at Lestna Retirement. I help retirement plan sponsors to lessen fiduciary and administrative responsibilities, align retirement plan offerings with their goals, and customize it to the benefits of all employees. Learn More…

Most Popular

  • Best Coverdell ESA Providers
  • Coverdell as a Savings Option For Homeschoolers
  • Best Roth IRA Brokers
  • How Frequently Should You Rebalance?
  • Seven Ways to Hedge Your Portfolio

Tags

401k 529plan asset allocation books compounding coverdell education investing ira markets options rebalancing retirement risk roth SEP IRA strategy taxes volatility

Copyright © 2019 · Genesis Sample Theme On Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.